Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	RAZER RAZER
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140507
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 00:35
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4702HQ 3,582 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 167 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 449 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Intel(8086 0416) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 26.9 Parallax 5.78 3% 12.1 fps	MRender 7.52 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 6.87 5% 5.55 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-00000 128GB 239 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT2200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 98 94 98 114 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 463 Write 123 Mixed 133 SusWrite 97.9 44% 204 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 23.9 109% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 56.9 90% 178 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 79%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 89GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 29 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 12.9 21% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00LUCT-62C26Y0 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 6GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 16 20 16 16 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 35.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 17.4 38% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 19%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 26GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 34.5 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 13.8 36% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 32%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 15 11 15 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	9.73% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 6.8 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 13.3 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 22%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 56GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.1 6 6.9 6.4 6.3 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 8.2 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 6.4 16% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.1 187% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 15.6 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,063x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,448x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	598x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	400x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,758x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16