Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '20 at 23:42
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 93 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 764 72% 597 Pts	64-Core 812 50% 812 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.9% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 108 Parallax 103 83% 104 fps	MRender 148 Gravity 95.8 Splatting 90.7 89% 112 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 356 375 387 402 407 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 1,360 Write 1,176 Mixed 320 SusWrite 370 179% 807 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 59.4 168% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,177 DQ Write 51.9 DQ Mixed 35.7 171% 422 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 228%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 260GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 416 360 395 303 260 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 456 Write 435 Mixed 316 SusWrite 350 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 20.9 79% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 103 80% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 87%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 115GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 27.7 Mixed 30 SusWrite 17.3 20% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00LUCT-62C26Y0 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 223GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 39.7 49% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 108GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 151 Write 62.7 Mixed 87 SusWrite 46.6 104% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.3 234% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 40%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 32GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 35.3 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 18.8 38% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 54GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 5.9 5 5.1 5.8 6.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Read 24 Write 10 Mixed 7 SusWrite 5.8 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.5 71% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 22.5 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 25.2 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,073x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	473x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,454x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	401x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	824x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	288x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,768x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	291x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16