Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '20 at 21:40
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 130
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 544
48% 407 Pts
64-Core 1,259
78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 112
Parallax 93.4
81% 102 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 102
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,720
Write 470
Mixed 501
194% 897 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 37.8
136% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 280
230% 339 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 214%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
9GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 447
Mixed 384
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 40.7
131% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 330
254% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
209GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 129 132 133 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 144
Mixed 97
SusWrite 133
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 109%
Mass Storage Device 250GB
15GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 13.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 35
35% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
67GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 40
Write 28.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 38.5
46% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 54.6
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 44.5
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback