Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 29.6 2-Core 58.5 40% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 148 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 830F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.61% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 1.31 3% 3.06 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 2.91 2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.61% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 717GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 70 35 67 68 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 32.1 Write 56.7 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 75.2 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 156 160 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 156 Write 153 Mixed 39 SusWrite 157 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 6 6.1 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 24.6 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 6.2 27% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 70%
TrekStor DS maxi classic 1TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 381GB free, PID 0020 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 16.9 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 6.1 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 17%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 25.9 Mixed 25 SusWrite 6.1 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 126% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 75%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1TB free, PID 003f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 25.6 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 6.1 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 28%
TrekStor DS maxi pace 3.0 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 007d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 24.6 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 6.1 27% 20 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 79%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 513GB free, PID 003f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6 6.1 6.1 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Read 27.8 Write 25.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 6.1 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 28%
TrekStor DS maxi Xpress 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 56GB free, PID 0039 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.46% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 25.9 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 6.1 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.46% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	76x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	69x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	28x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	24x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	7x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	164x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	113x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353