MSI MS-1775

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GS72 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1775  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 00:14
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 168
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 381
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 1164) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 7.09
6% 18.4 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 14.3
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3512GG2 512GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 247 326 325 203 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 422
Write 393
Mixed 324
SusWrite 272
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 19.5
75% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 28.9
DQ Mixed 177
127% 172 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
896GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 115 115 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 116
68% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 19.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 22.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1775 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1775

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback