Acer Aspire M3802

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3802 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EG43M
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090831
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 00:09
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E3300-$60 2,428 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 40.9 31% 42.2 Pts	4-Core 38.3 8-Core 38.3 5% 38.3 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8436) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 1.41 4% 4.09 fps	MRender 6.86 Gravity 4.63 Splatting 3.48 4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 48 66 51 62 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 81.5 Write 76.2 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 55.6 47% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 954 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.7 1% 0.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 7%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB 1,289 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 292GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM2X2048-6400C5DHX 4x2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3802 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3802

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	10x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	2x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x

SSD
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 2,148 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
JAJS300M240C 240GBBench 71%, 1,437 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	4x
M3 78T2863QZS-CF7 4x1GBCEBench 19%, 10 samples	2x
2x2GBGU342G0ALEPR692C6FBench 17%, 66 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $115

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16