Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 00:55
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 216
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 739
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 2,640
163% 2,640 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 184
Parallax 187
132% 178 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 168
Splatting 115
108% 134 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 119%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 581 577 573 566 556 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,038
Write 1,703
Mixed 731
SusWrite 618
282% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 55.3
198% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 581
436% 585 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 206%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
47GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 135 134 120 114 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 463
Mixed 364
SusWrite 154
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 48.7
170% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 228
206% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
59GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 465 467 468 457 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 466
Mixed 372
SusWrite 435
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 52.8
176% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 330
255% 348 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
42GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 19 17 9.1 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 97.3
Write 44.8
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 20.5
42% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 5.2
841% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 50.9
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback