Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 23:15
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 227
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 741
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 2,710
168% 2,710 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 182
Parallax 187
135% 178 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 171
Splatting 124
115% 142 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 122%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 643 646 649 650 649 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,823
Write 1,700
Mixed 666
SusWrite 707
273% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 54.8
187% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 713
525% 695 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 205%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
125GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 462 462 450 446 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 449
Mixed 372
SusWrite 456
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 52.8
178% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 331
256% 350 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
7GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 451
Mixed 384
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 50.3
176% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 231
208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
180GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 137 137 139 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 111
Write 82.3
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 137
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 61.2
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 52.6
160% 56 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 139%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback