Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q550

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemFujitsu STYLISTIC Q550  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB230
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111101
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateMar 03 '17 at 01:34
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z670
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 5.1
2-Core 9.9
26% 28.6 Pts
4-Core 8.9
8-Core 9.6
1% 9.25 Pts
64-Core 10.4
1% 10.4 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 600
Fujitsu(10CF 16B5)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.6.3077
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.18% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.19
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.18%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFB062GMSJ 62GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AJF10204 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 122
Write 42.8
Mixed 52.4
16% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.01
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 3.29
15% 5.63 MB/s
DQ Read 8.43
DQ Write 6.38
DQ Mixed 3.87
4% 6.22 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB Chip DDR2 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.18% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 1.3
MC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.67 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback