HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '20 at 22:34
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 162 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 345 45% 340 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 3619) 2GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 1.16 2% 2.11 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.78 2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hua722020ala330 EIT 2TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: JKAOA33B SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 41 25 34 56 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 109 Write 99.3 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 51.8 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 72%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB 872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 83GB free Firmware: 3.AHG SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 36 40 38 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	27% Poor	Read 53.6 Write 26 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 40.3 30% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 43%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 146GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 36 40 38 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 66 Write 66.2 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 40.6 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	598x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	316x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	142x
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16