Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 18:44
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 502
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.2
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 35.7
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pioneer APS-SL2-120 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 186 120 122 99 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 429
Write 352
Mixed 328
SusWrite 176
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 16.1
111% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 26.4
63% 128 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
380GB free
Firmware: CC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 126 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 126
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C16K2 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback