bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 864 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 13:37
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 164
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 466
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 11D0) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.81
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.6
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 86GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,728
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,603
357% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 94.2
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 93.4
309% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 666
452% 560 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 51%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
8GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 245
Write 63.2
Mixed 140
SusWrite 57.8
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 4.9
896% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 40.5
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 103%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback