bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime24.7 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 22:20
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 79
2-Core 154
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 299
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 224MB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.14.1.24
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 9.38
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 258GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.4 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 12 30 36 27 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 2.8
Write 66.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 30.4
19% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 5.6
967% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 11GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 12 30 37 27 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.98% Terrible
Read 3.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 29.3
17% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 4.5
748% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 19.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback