Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '17 at 09:59
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$49 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 150 59% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 142 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1005 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Lighting 45.7 Reflection 51.8 Parallax 63.9 37% 53.8 fps	MRender 50.5 Gravity 43.1 Splatting 40 36% 44.5 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 9020468 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -136176233080250 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3062 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 33 (B1) Unknown 0 0 9 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 73 81609162785 (C2) HDA temperature 33 73 81609162785 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9020468 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9020468 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9020468 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9573 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3696 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3696 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7821	50.5% Above average	Read 412 Write 66.1 Mixed 105 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 15.5 88% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 26.4 38% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 38GB free Firmware: 12.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 154 5050 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10852 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16891 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7036 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10856 (C2) HDA temperature 116 97 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	32% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 55.7 Mixed 58.1 43% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.33 89% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 55%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB 2,495 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 31GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 91 68478442 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11860 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 35056054788 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21558 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8794 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 555810849 (C2) HDA temperature 33 53 60129542177 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 49 126439233 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 115 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.3% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 50.2 Mixed 47.9 38% 50 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.41 89% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RM25664BA1339.16FF 2x2GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
X3 240GBTcsunbowBench 78%, 3,491 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
PSD38G13332 1x8GBPatriotBench 26%, 879 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369