Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel D946GZIS
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071107
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateAug 01 '15 at 22:28
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.20GHz-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 60.2
20% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 59.1
8-Core 59.3
8% 59.2 Pts
64-Core 59.6
4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 14% Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
MSI(1462 2630) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 203
Write 185
Mixed 168
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 15.8
69% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 17.4
19% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70
222GB free
Firmware: LV010A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 54.3
Mixed 30.3
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31%
Great: 34%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 32
Write 24
Mixed 17.9
30% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.19
57% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
13GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 24.9
Mixed 9.19
25% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.32
35% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 34%
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback