Today's hottest deals

MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A33
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 27 '17 at 13:00
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 670
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 111
Parallax 89.9
89% 103 fps
MRender 93
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 95.1
77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 471
Write 212
Mixed 236
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 10.4
77% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 53.1
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 15.3
19% 34 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 141
Mixed 125
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.27
110% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 96%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 145
Write 172
Mixed 108
183% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.23
49% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 64%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
488GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 75.4
Write 77.7
Mixed 72.6
97% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.27
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
359GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 109
Write 87
Mixed 93.9
121% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.28
50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
80GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 46.9
Mixed 54.2
65% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.31
74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 38%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
26GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 74.6
Write 75.2
Mixed 48.4
83% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.31
88% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback