Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-W9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-W9  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '20 at 12:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 55
2-Core 87.8
44% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 312
29% 242 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1659) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6.84
6% 7.96 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 14
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 897 845 806 766 747 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,711
Write 1368
Mixed 1016
SusWrite 860
277% 1,239 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 38.7
113% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 263
209% 294 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 171%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-AGS1O5IK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15-W9 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-W9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback