Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-W9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-W9  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 10:36
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 694
71% 574 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 1659) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68% Good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 92.5
Parallax 79.2
68% 84.9 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 72.5
69% 86 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2032 1979 2033 1726 1569 1776 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,611
Write 1,492
Mixed 1054
SusWrite 1,852
338% 1,502 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 59.3
216% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 414
341% 500 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 268%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-AGS1O5IK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 27.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 28.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15-W9 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-W9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback