Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime23.5 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 20:15
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 180
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 443
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 6.19
3% 5.25 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 676
Write 479
Mixed 424
116% 526 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 42
156% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 483
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 255
215% 320 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 220%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
16GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 40 37 39 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 38
Write 35.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 38.1
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 37%
HGST HDN 726050ALE610 5TB
106GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 24 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.4% Poor
Read 113
Write 124
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 23.5
100% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
75% 1.03 MB/s
HGST HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
54GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 75.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 23.1
57% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 39%
HGST HDN 726060ALE614 6TB
271GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
Read 134
Write 120
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 23.1
104% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 81%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
13GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 67 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 68.3
116% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
0GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36
Write 44.7
Mixed 21.3
43% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback