Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 10:09
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 187
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 326
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 104A) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.88
2% 2.15 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.91
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00000 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 171 208 207 210 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.5% Average
Read 214
Write 206
Mixed 125
SusWrite 190
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 22.7
88% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 30.1
30% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 93%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 7.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 10.8
15% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 830B M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG 18GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback