Asus H110M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-E  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 12:15
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 158
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 262
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 36.8
31% 35.3 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 35.4
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 78 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 248
Write 85.3
Mixed 68
SusWrite 78
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 18
74% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 110
88% 126 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
465GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 158
Write 146
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 0
61% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 134 134 134 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 95.3
Write 128
Mixed 80
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 126GB
83GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 5.8 9.1 8.4 5 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 8.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 8.2
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.9
91% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston 9905702-120.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-E Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback