Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '20 at 20:20
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$70
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 167
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 270
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 42.1
41% 48.9 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 55.1
Splatting 51.6
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 54 73 52 67 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 470
Write 82.6
Mixed 134
SusWrite 66.9
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 33.8
120% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 46.5
61% 114 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 101%
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: 003056R6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 85 65 71 71 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 468
Write 351
Mixed 316
SusWrite 80.4
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 37.8
132% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 148
140% 219 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
13GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 13.7
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 13.5
20% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.6
201% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston 9905702-120.A00G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.1
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback