bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55PJ
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100614
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '17 at 13:51
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 134
54% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 166
25% 181 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Intel(8086 0036) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 73.2
Write 71.7
Mixed 73.5
55% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Portable 320GB
230GB free, PID 2330
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 21.7
Mixed 23.3
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.26
30% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 10.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback