Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77EB
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130312
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration423 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 505
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 429 415 410 408 408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 473
Write 428
Mixed 329
SusWrite 416
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 27.6
92% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 259
218% 314 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
769GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 167 171 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 160
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 168
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
Hds725050kla360 39M0159 39M0158IBM 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: K2AOAQ1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 62 57 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 63.6
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 60.6
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M0 9C0CD23B 941EF1C0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback