Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120731
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 17:59
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 119
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3557) 1GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 22.8
14% 19.3 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 23
Splatting 17.3
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 262 265 289 302 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 354
Write 286
Mixed 298
SusWrite 275
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 23.6
76% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 141
111% 156 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 125%
Hds725050kla360 39M0159 39M0158IBM 500GB
208GB free
Firmware: K2AOAT3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 33.4
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 34%
Hds725050kla360 39M0159 39M0158IBM 500GB
292GB free
Firmware: K2AOAT3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 50.4
Write 44.1
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 56.4
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%
Hds725050kla360 39M0159 39M0158IBM 500GB
385GB free
Firmware: K2AOAT3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 56.1
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 56.4
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 34%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
465GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 122 124 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 122
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 15.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970DE3/U3S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback