Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Nitro N50-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-600(DCH)
Memory	16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200304
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 02:36
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 245 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 657 63% 519 Pts	64-Core 648 40% 648 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.3% Below average	Lighting 44.3 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 36.2 36% 41.1 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 39 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 747GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 99 88 128 135 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 77 SusWrite 105 72% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 109%
USB3.0 500GB 264 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 421GB free Firmware: 9128 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 7 7.8 7.1 7 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 39.5 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 7.6 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 67%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB 2,396 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0GB free Firmware: 0003HPM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 59.8 Write 59.3 Mixed 37.7 39% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
USB3.0 640GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 590GB free Firmware: 9128 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 7 7.7 7.1 7 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 38.4 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 7.6 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 64%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 126GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 104GB free, PID 0cd1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 19 7.2 12 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 218 Write 48.3 Mixed 112 SusWrite 13.1 106% 98 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 8.3 737% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 14.4 DQ Mixed 10.2 909% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 84%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 87GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.2 5.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 41.9 Write 32.9 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 4.3 36% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.9 193% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 45%
mSD Card 67GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 54GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.2% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 11 SusWrite 4.2 10% 9.15 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 3.6 261% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 16%
SDXC Card 268GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 244GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 2.7 4% 2.55 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 12% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 19%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 0021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 5.3 2 5.4 5.9 5.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 6 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 4.5 9% 9.75 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 9%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 1,909 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 15GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 14 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Read 34.7 Write 33.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 13 33% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 8502 PSD416G26662 8502 PSD48G266681 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.8% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 23.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,907x
Core i5-8400Intel $130Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	1,326x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	422x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	886x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	551x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	532x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	667x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	245x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	227x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	336x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	315x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples	199x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16