Acer Aspire XC-330

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-330  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-330
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 19:42
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 32.2
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 69.4
32% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 51.5
8-Core 69.7
8% 60.6 Pts
64-Core 58.4
4% 58.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 1216) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 18.50.18
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.1
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 51 49 37 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 118
Write 47.4
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 42.6
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 113%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
30GB free
Firmware: 2108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 64 77 67 73 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 55.9
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 66
37% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 70%
mSD Card 67GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.8 7.1 5.8 5 6.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.72% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.8
8% 6.68 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-330 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback