Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '17 at 13:48
Run Duration442 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$56
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 425
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 37.3
38% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 37.9
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 70.7
Write 72.4
Mixed 69.5
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 48%
WD WD30EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
128GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 115
Write 127
Mixed 110
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.22
96% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 79%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB
122GB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 37.2
Mixed 37.2
48% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.35
94% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
14GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 4
Mixed 7.16
12% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.007
16% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-DS2 Builds (Compare 3,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2 - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback