Today's hottest deals

Lenovo Crimson V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo Crimson V  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0x36A017AA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime16 Days
Run DateOct 04 '20 at 14:54
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 65
2-Core 117
49% 82 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 145
24% 169 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36A0) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 11
6% 8.78 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 8.73
Splatting 7.78
6% 7.49 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc 2.5 SSD 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 299 308 328 345 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 409
Write 347
Mixed 318
SusWrite 317
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 20.6
88% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 38.5
74% 146 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 97%
JMicron Generic DISK01 500GB
403GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 92 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 91.6
124% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%
JMicron Generic DISK02 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 90 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
Read 93.6
Write 91
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 88.5
114% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 39%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
819GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 3.1 4.5 2.8 1.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 137
Write 135
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 3.9
113% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK04 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 8.6 8.7 5.9 4.3 3 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 196
Write 155
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 7.7
131% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 9.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback