PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7693 |
Motherboard | MSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693) (all builds) |
Memory | 20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160108 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 11 '20 at 03:27 |
Run Duration | 308 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.3%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 346 305 293 280 271 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
|||
FCCT128M4SSD1 128GB
18GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 143 154 141 138 132 MB/s
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 165 164 165 170 168 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 177 180 181 179 181 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
JMicron Generic DISK03 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 78 83 83 83 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 78 82 82 82 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
|||
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
520GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
JMicron Generic DISK02 1.5TB
352GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.4 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.7 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
JMicron Generic DISK04 8TB
251GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 27 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
660GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 88 94 94 94 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
|||
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 50 44 33 33 33 MB/s
|
30%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 102x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 84x |
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 28x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $383 |