Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 2020M 9,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 125 52% 85.6 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 121 17% 124 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 90AC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 286 361 375 383 390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 384 Write 335 Mixed 285 SusWrite 358 77% 340 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 14.8 60% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 139 114% 164 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-YK0 8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.2% Average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 13.7 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 749 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CF8 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16