HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 213B
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 05:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 46
26% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 85.6
8-Core 82.3
11% 83.9 Pts
64-Core 78.5
5% 78.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 213B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 2.31
2% 2.66 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 64 59 47 44 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 392
Write 320
Mixed 166
SusWrite 80.6
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 11.8
60% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 84.2
81% 127 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 82%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
236GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 27.3
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 28.6
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-055.A00LF HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback