Notebook P377SM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook P377SM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P377SM-A
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 10:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U40, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 519
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 0376) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 14 82 85 38 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 496
Write 413
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 114
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 0.9
51% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 0.5
26% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
376GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 60 59 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 93.1
Write 94
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 59.6
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P377SM-A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Notebook P377SM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback