Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 13:24
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$38
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 150
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 282
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 8447) 2GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 22.2
15% 19.1 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 21
Splatting 15.6
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB (TurboPC EX)
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 219 220 217 215 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung HD204UI (TurboPC EX) 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 89 94 105 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.8% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 51.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 95.2
12% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 0.6
8% 18 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 295 300 317 320 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 302
Write 299
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 295
176% 243 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 171%
Great: 236%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 250 260 266 267 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 256
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 255
152% 209 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 144%
Great: 236%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 1 USB Device (TurboPC EX) 9TB
4.5TB free, PID 01cd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 255 261 283 272 283 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
200% Outstanding
Read 310
Write 163
Mixed 55
SusWrite 251
240% 195 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 1.1
1,152% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 3.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
128% 1.43 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF F3-10666CL9-8GBNT 99U5471-052.A00LF F3-10666CL9-8GBNT 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback