Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130507
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 20 '17 at 15:46
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 106
2-Core 202
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 566
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.5
Reflection 114
Parallax 100
81% 105 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 101
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65% Good
Read 480
Write 203
Mixed 237
67% 307 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 10.8
93% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 14.1
50% 111 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65%
Great: 104%
Samsung 840 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: 8B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 511
Write 133
Mixed 196
61% 280 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 9.74
110% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 28
65% 139 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 102%
SSI H/W RAID5 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0957 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
Read 92.5
Write 61.2
Mixed 84.3
60% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.11
727% 5.86 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 136
Write 96.4
Mixed 65.4
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.22
73% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
630GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64% Good
Read 108
Write 116
Mixed 30.8
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.14
56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 96%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205
352GB free
Firmware: 1L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 112
Write 126
Mixed 116
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.69
156% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$138
49GB free
Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 68.1
Mixed 62.7
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.59
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
16GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 92.6
Write 118
Mixed 6.32
52% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.18
87% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 75.5
Write 124
Mixed 57.3
114% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.57
381% 4.12 MB/s
DQ Read 1.63
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 0.54
376% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
629GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 36.6
Write 84
Mixed 64.7
88% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 8.85
4K Mixed 0.38
316% 3.28 MB/s
DQ Read 0.82
DQ Write 6.62
DQ Mixed 0.65
250% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $579

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $974
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback