Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 20:03
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 189
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 564
54% 448 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3973 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 178
Parallax 195
144% 183 fps
MRender 211
Gravity 161
Splatting 114
127% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 113
Write 139
Mixed 146
SusWrite 84.8
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 20.1
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 136
105% 145 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 66%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
51GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 240 243 236 235 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.6% Good
Read 243
Write 233
Mixed 236
SusWrite 240
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 33.6
106% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
588GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 93 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 328
Write 151
Mixed 200
SusWrite 93.9
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 27.4
89% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 155
119% 163 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 54%
Great: 133%
SSI H/W RAID5 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0962
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 191 189 189 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.7% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 100
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 188
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
440% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
457GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 120
Write 35.5
Mixed 69
SusWrite 133
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 29.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback