Packard EasyNote TE11BZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPackard EasyNote TE11BZ  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 21:03
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 41
1-Core 9
2-Core 16.9
18% 22.3 Pts
4-Core 17.3
8-Core 18.5
2% 17.9 Pts
64-Core 17.9
1% 17.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Acer(1025 0690) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 90 96 97 94 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 170
Write 163
Mixed 143
SusWrite 89.5
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10.7
35% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 77
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 30.7
28% 44 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT2KIT51264BF160B 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.7
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TE11BZ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE11BZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback