Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 09:07
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 130
65% 103 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 207
30% 217 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 53.5
47% 56.3 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 53.5
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 153 141 60 41 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 245
Write 216
Mixed 209
SusWrite 87.8
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 23.5
81% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 98.4
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 127
101% 137 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
82GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 80 90 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 87.2
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
186GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 28 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32
Write 27.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 29.2
39% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 0A94 D3R4GL16A8R 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $191
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback