bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 68% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel D54250WYK
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '17 at 09:23
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 68%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4250U-$499
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 66
2-Core 108
54% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 159
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB-$299
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT42B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 486
Write 337
Mixed 351
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 19.3
88% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 62.4
73% 128 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
43GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.1% Good
Read 489
Write 266
Mixed 292
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 12.9
65% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 54.3
75% 139 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 82%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 21GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 492
Write 240
Mixed 349
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 13.4
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 32.9
60% 119 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 9.09
Mixed 13
16% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback