Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 29 '15 at 19:56
Run Duration394 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
69% 151 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 662
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 850C) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 9.03
8% 8.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
PNY(196E 1033) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 49.7
35% 43.9 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 37
Splatting 36
34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 402
Write 306
Mixed 396
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 19.2
92% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 41.5
74% 146 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
650GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 93.7
Mixed 103
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.24
87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
453GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 97.5
Mixed 91.8
72% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.27
99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 109
Write 97.2
Mixed 102
131% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.25
85% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
796GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 98.3
Write 90.8
Mixed 88.1
118% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.17
32% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 37%
WDC WD10 EADS-65L5B1 1TB
627GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 79.8
Mixed 84.9
108% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.28
81% 0.93 MB/s
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
546GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 74.4
Write 77.1
Mixed 53.9
87% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.13
51% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 37%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
519GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 86
Mixed 75.6
105% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.38
82% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%
WDC WD10 EADS-65L5B1 1TB
446GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.1% Below average
Read 75.9
Write 83.2
Mixed 77.5
103% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.26
86% 0.98 MB/s
ST310005 28AS 1TB
368GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 88.6
Write 71.2
Mixed 64.8
92% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.26
37% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 40%
WDC WD25 00JS-60MHB1 250GB
227GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
Read 60.1
Write 60.6
Mixed 56.9
76% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.46
88% 1.05 MB/s
Typical GA-X99-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback