TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20137

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20137  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G585
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 17:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 45.6
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 28.7
21% 28.8 Pts
4-Core 31.5
8-Core 30.4
4% 31 Pts
64-Core 29.2
2% 29.2 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 25.3%
 Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.85%
 Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N191129a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 32 8.2 8.9 18 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 217
Write 206
Mixed 152
SusWrite 32.1
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 8.1
30% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 89
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 68.6
55% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 23.3%
 Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.75% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 9.75%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 20137 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20137

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples8x
E-300 APUAMD  $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples3x
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples2x
GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples9x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples2x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples1x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples3x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples1x
MX500 250GBCrucial  $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples1x
RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples4x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples1x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 8,533 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback