Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 19:53
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 182
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 488
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 74%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 81.5
Parallax 68.3
56% 72.7 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 108
Splatting 72.9
68% 84.3 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 60%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 435 442 443 441 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 403
Write 176
Mixed 371
SusWrite 437
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 30.4
104% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 323
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 98%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
296GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 440 447 449 446 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 184
Mixed 448
SusWrite 442
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 43.9
143% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
156GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 435 442 444 441 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 392
Write 95.3
Mixed 370
SusWrite 437
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 30.6
105% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 326
247% 332 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 99%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
107GB free
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 188 201 167 202 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 724
Write 124
Mixed 282
SusWrite 196
72% 331 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 39.4
129% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 512
DQ Mixed 392
345% 520 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMD32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMD32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 32.4
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 21.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,056
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback