Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory43.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 22:00
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 312
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 948
97% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 114
Parallax 116
86% 112 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 24TB
21TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 622 638 641 655 605 665 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 621
Write 519
Mixed 124
SusWrite 638
106% 476 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 4.9
35% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 4.6
16% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 109%
Intel Optane+238G 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 560 378 9.1 86 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 101%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
339GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 58 84 57 90 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 456
Write 362
Mixed 184
SusWrite 99.6
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 14.1
67% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 29.4
42% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
WD My Passport 260D 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 72 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 76.2
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.8
257% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
H/W DISK 1 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: 0523
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 44 47 44 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 66.9
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 45.6
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
384% 2.87 MB/s
H/W DISK 3 1TB
62GB free
Firmware: 0523
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 44 47 44 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 104
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 45.6
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
H/W DISK 4 1.5TB
759GB free
Firmware: 0523
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 44 47 44 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 45.6
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
H/W DISK 2 1.5TB
829GB free
Firmware: 0523
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 44 47 44 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 66.5
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 45.5
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
H/W RAID 0 (Striping) 16TB
13TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 238 239 241 210 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 147
Write 206
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 232
234% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 30.3
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 44.9
SC Mixed 30.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback