Oegstone DQ67SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemOegstone DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 15:09
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 165
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 307
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 111
Parallax 71.2
71% 89.8 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 77.4
72% 88.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 54 54 55 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 72.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 54.1
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 126 128 127 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 117
Write 90.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 126
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 11.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback