Oegstone DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOegstone DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory15.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 13:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 161
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 300
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 142
Parallax 92.3
83% 112 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 78
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900M13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 80 55 94 42 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 205
Write 148
Mixed 177
SusWrite 80.5
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 14.2
54% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 28.7
36% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
355GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 81 82 82 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 70.1
Write 69.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 81.6
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback