Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	10.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '20 at 19:03
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 711 75% 603 Pts	64-Core 716 44% 716 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6286) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,602 Write 2,230 Mixed 1,733 486% 2,189 MB/s	4K Read 67.2 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 85 289% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,600 DQ Write 1,398 DQ Mixed 1,447 1,099% 1,482 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 487GB free Firmware: UH4400RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 110 63 125 59 4.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 452 Write 370 Mixed 312 SusWrite 84.6 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 14.8 69% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 89 DQ Mixed 30.2 42% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 58%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 7GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 373 Mixed 456 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 56.4 189% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 355 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 119%
Lio-org FILEIO 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 392GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 70 80 84 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 66.5 Write 83.7 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 78.5 17% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 12.6 44% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 41.4 DQ Write 36.8 DQ Mixed 34.2 27% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB 9,486 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 24.5 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 26.8 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $385Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,013x
Core i7-9700KIntel $240Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	303x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	113x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	114x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $387Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	111x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	102x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $118Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	171x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $100Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	91x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $100Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	49x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $105Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,044

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406