Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA790GPT-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790GPT-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 105
53% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 186
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3300
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 81.7
Parallax 79.2
50% 73.9 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 65
58% 72.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 90 75 68 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 181
Write 189
Mixed 180
SusWrite 75.8
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 30.9
97% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 36.6
29% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
244GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 92 79 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 98
Write 93.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 84.1
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 76%
AMD 2+1 Disk RAID5 2TB
519GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 142
Write 47
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 39
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA790GPT-UD3H Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790GPT-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback