Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 19:04
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 134
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 202
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
POV(1ACC 30A7) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.8
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 17 16 59 49 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 64.1
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 41
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
303GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 109 109 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 146
Write 107
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 109
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
637GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 72 74 100 97 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 119
Write 112
Mixed 77
SusWrite 89.9
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
109GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 10.8
18% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 24.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 10.9
16% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0511
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 26.7
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 10.7
18% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
220% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback