Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FC
Memory	8.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200407
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '21 at 06:56
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 113 2-Core 187 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 460 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 85FC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.7% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 7.1 5% 27.7 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 10.7 7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 747 Write 556 Mixed 556 138% 620 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 29.6 97% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 215 173% 244 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 138GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 370 353 379 397 397 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 447 Write 406 Mixed 314 SusWrite 371 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 22.8 75% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 246 186% 254 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 133%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 8GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.2 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.7 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 3.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.2 7% 5.23 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2667 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 88 45% 88 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,651x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,528x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	502x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	431x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	421x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	280x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	723x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	439x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	406x