Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1885
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 10:46
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 31
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 26.3
16% 22.6 Pts
4-Core 14.9
8-Core 33.9
3% 24.4 Pts
64-Core 34
2% 34 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 1885) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.23 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 64 57 59 73 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 91
Write 72
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 66.9
48% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 58%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
69GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 19 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 14
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 20.6
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 3.2
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback